Claudell Earl Martin v. B.J. Bunnell, Warden Attorney General of California Dan Lungren

53 F.3d 339 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Claudell Earl MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. B.J. BUNNELL, Warden; Attorney General of California; Dan Lungren, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-55498. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided May 8, 1995. As Amended June 13, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Claudell Earl Martin appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his state court convictions for first and second degree murder. Martin argues that the trial court erred by denying his request for substitute counsel, and erred again by denying his request to proceed pro se to trial. Martin also argues that his due process rights were violated because the district court failed to inform him of the charges brought against him. Finally, Martin contends there was insufficient evidence to support his…