Bethea Parsons v. Robert C. Brower Tom Moss Cindy Campbell David Parmenter Leroy R. Nelson

Good Law
53 F.3d 339·1995 WL 251123·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22821
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 199594-35626California1,541 words

Opinion

Opinion

53 F.3d 339 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bethea PARSONS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert C. BROWER; Tom Moss; Cindy Campbell; David Parmenter; Leroy R. Nelson; et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-35626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 28, 1995. IN PART, REVERSED IN PART. Before: BROWNING, SNEED and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bethea Parsons appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action against numerous judges, prosecuting attorneys, public defenders, and various Idaho state officials. She also appeals from the district court's entry of a pre-filing order against her and the Parsons family. Robert Parsons, her husband, also challenges the pre-filing order as applied to him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm in part and reverse in part. I. Background 3 This action apparently stems from a state criminal action against Bethea Parsons for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.