The Bergen

Good Law
50 F.2d 447·1931 A.M.C. 1149·1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1409
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 1931No. 21California703 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McCormick, J.

This libel has been under consideration for some time. At the hearing and until the libelant cited Morse Drydock & Repair Co. v. Northern Star, 271 U. S. 552 , 46 S. Ct. 589 , 70 L. Ed. 1082 , there appeared to be no question as to the invalidity and unen-forceability of a maritime lien upon the vessel Bergen, in the light of the evidence and the provisions of the Ship Mortgage Act 1920 (46 USCA § 911 et seq.), and particularly subsection R of section 30 thereof (46 USCA § 973). The language used by Justice Holmes in the main opinion of the Northern Star, supra, has caused no little uncertainty *448 as to the proper rule for this court to follow in the decision of this matter. Upon mature deliberation of the evidence and analysis of the Northern Star Case, as well as upon examination of all of the other decisions cited by proctors, I have concluded that the language of Justice Holmes that has caused the uncertainty is dicta and does not control this libel. The ruling in the Northern Star was that the mortgage under consideration lost its preferred status and its paramount feature over other liens because of the failure of the mortgagee to comply with the conditions specified in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.