Pete Ornelas v. U.S. Postal Service

53 F.3d 339 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Pete ORNELAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55593. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 26, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pete Ornelas appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to reopen his employment discrimination lawsuit against the United States Postal Service. Ornelas voluntarily dismissed his action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1) and then filed a motion to reopen. To the extent that Ornelas challenges the voluntary dismissal, we dismiss the appeal. To the extent that Ornelas challenges the denial of his motion to reopen, we have jurisdiction pursuant to 12 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 An individual may not appeal a voluntary dismissal made pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1). See Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co., 764 F.2d 1329, 1342 (9th…