Ray Donald Pratt v. Bruce Banks, Cpo Kenneth Giddens, Cpo Roger Crist, Warden, Sgt. Mayer Lt. Woods

53 F.3d 339 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ray Donald PRATT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce BANKS, CPO; Kenneth Giddens, CPO; Roger Crist, Warden, Sgt. Mayer; Lt. Woods, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15793. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 26, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, D.C. No. CV-91-00391-JMR; John M. Roll, District Judge, Presiding. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nevada state prisoner Ray Donald Pratt appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Pratt's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights actions. Pratt alleged that the defendants denied him adequate outdoor exercise, practiced double celling, and denied him access to grievance procedures. Because the district court's order did not dispose all of Pratt's claims, and because Pratt did not obtain Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)…