United States v. Jairo Lozano

53 F.3d 340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jairo LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10618. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 27, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jairo Lozano appeals his conviction following a conditional guilty plea to possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Lozano contends that the district court erred by denying his suppression motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . 1 We review the district court's denial of the motion to suppress de novo and its factual findings for clear error, United States v. Becker, 23 F.3d 1537, 1539 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. 3 Lozano contends he was unjustifiably detained after officers stopped him for speeding because they ordered him out of the truck he was driving for further…