United States v. Dean E. Lillie

Good Law
53 F.3d 340·1995 WL 247203·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22748
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 199594-30317California313 words

Opinion

Opinion

53 F.3d 340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean E. LILLIE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-30317. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 27, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The United States appeals the district court's order denying its motion to set for retrial the case of Dean Lillie. Lillie's conviction for tax evasion and conspiracy to obstruct the Internal Revenue Service was previously reversed on appeal because Lillie was denied his choice of retained counsel. United States v. Lillie, 989 F.2d 1054 (9th Cir. 1993). 3 The United States contends that the district court erred by deciding that it lacked authority to retry Lillie because our previous decision and mandate did not specifically order remanding for retrial. Lillie argues that the law of the case doctrine and the mandate rule preclude us from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.