United States v. Wallace Kau Chang

53 F.3d 340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wallace Kau CHANG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10625. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 13, 1995. Decided April 28, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Hawaii, DC No. CR-87-00887-ACK; Alan C. Kay, District Judge, Presiding. Before: FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Wallace Kau Chang (Chang) appeals the district court's dismissal of his Petition for Removal of Garnishment and Reconsideration of Claimed Exemption. We dismiss Chang's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 Chang was a civilian employee of the Navy from 1943 to 1986. On June 24, 1987, he was indicted in the district court on nine counts of mail fraud and aiding and abetting in the making of false claims and transporting stolen goods. These counts arose from Chang's involvement from 1982 through 1985 in…