Jack K. Stein v. Tana Wood

Good Law
53 F.3d 340·1995 WL 139365·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22731
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 199594-35573California983 words

Opinion

Opinion

53 F.3d 340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack K. STEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35573. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994 * Memorandum Disposition Filed Nov. 18, 1994. Memorandum Withdrawn March 30, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 We withdraw the memorandum disposition filed November 18, 1994. With the filing of the new memorandum disposition, the panel votes to deny Jack Stein's petition for rehearing. The panel also rejects the suggestion for rehearing en banc. 2 We deny Stein's motions to file an amended petition for rehearing and to file a "traverse." 3 The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. 4 The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. 5 MEMORANDUM **…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.