United States v. Thomas Lambert, United States of America v. Tammy Bird

53 F.3d 340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas LAMBERT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tammy BIRD, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-10349, 94-10369. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1995. * Decided April 14, 1995. Before: BRUNETTI, THOMPSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Thomas Lambert conditionally pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Tammy Bird conditionally pled guilty to interstate travel in aid of racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1952 . Both reserved the right to appeal the district court's denial of their motions to suppress evidence seized from their residence pursuant to a warrant. That evidence included methamphetamine, a hand gun, and narcotics paraphernalia. We have jurisdiction over both appeals under 28 U.S.C.…