United States v. Rodney Leroy Bean

53 F.3d 340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Leroy BEAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10597. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1995. * Decided April 14, 1995. Before: BRUNETTI, THOMPSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rodney Leroy Bean appeals his conviction for the manufacture, distribution, and possession of an electronic communication intercepting device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2512 (1)(b), and his conviction for the unauthorized use of communications, in violation of 47 U.S.C. Sec. 605 (e)(4). He also moves to strike the government's answering brief and excerpt of record filed in this court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We deny Bean's motion to strike and affirm his conviction. I. 3 Bean moves to strike the government's excerpt and answering brief because both contain excerpts of a grand jury transcript which he claims…