Vathsala Srinivasan v. Devry Institute of Technology

Good Law
53 F.3d 340·1995 WL 242307·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22724
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 25, 199593-56413California2,467 words

Opinion

Opinion

53 F.3d 340 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vathsala SRINIVASAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEVRY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56413. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 5, 1995. Decided April 25, 1995. 1 IN PART, REVERSED AND VACATED IN PART. 2 Before: D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, * District Judge. 3 MEMORANDUM ** 4 Appellant Vathsala Srinivasan appeals from the district court's denial of postjudgment motions arising from her Title VII claim against appellee DeVry Institute of Technology ("DeVry") for wrongful termination based on gender discrimination. Srinivasan alleges that the district court improperly granted summary judgment on the merits and erroneously denied her postjudgment motions to alter or amend summary judgment, to impeach witnesses, to vacate a contempt order, and to disqualify the magistrate judge. We find a lack of jurisdiction to consider the merits of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.