United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of America v. Bourne Bobby Thomas

53 F.3d 341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Teofilo SOLORIO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bourne Bobby THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50507, 93-50508. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. Decided April 26, 1995. IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendants-Appellants Jose Teofilo Solorio and Bourne Bobby Thomas were convicted of conspiring to sell methamphetamine and were sentenced to 121 months in prison. Their appeals were consolidated. Both Thomas and Solorio maintain that the government's conduct in this case was so outrageous as to violate due process. We disagree. Nor do we find merit in Solorio's claims that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict against him or that his conviction should be…