Wpm, Inc. v. Full Pro Industrial Company, Ltd.

53 F.3d 341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. WPM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FULL PRO INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, LTD., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-55447. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 26, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Full Pro Industrial Company, Ltd. ("Full Pro") appeals the district court's entry of a default judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2) in favor of WPM, Inc. in WPM's action alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition. 1 Full Pro contends that the district court abused its discretion by granting the default judgment because it had good cause for failing to file an answer to WPM's amended complaint and attempted to file its answer before the district court entered its default judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 On March 18, 1993, the district court clerk entered a…