United States of America, Plaintiff v. Albert Manley Perez

53 F.3d 341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff- Appellee, v. Albert Manley PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10286. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 17, 1995. Decided April 25, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Albert Manley Perez appeals his conviction for stealing government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 641 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. FACTS 3 Appellant Perez owned a computer business in Guam called AMP Computers, which sold, among other things, a brand of computer hardware called ALR. His friend and partner, Juan Palomo, worked in the supply depot of Naval Station Guam. An AMP employee testified that one day Palomo called Perez at AMP and asked if Perez knew of anyone who needed monitors because he had some that were just "laying around." 4 On May 14, 1994, Palomo, with the help of…