United States v. Jose Solario
Opinion
Opinion
53 F.3d 341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose SOLARIO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50443. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 1, 1995. * Decided May 4, 1995. 1 IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART. 2 Before: BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, Senior District Judge. ** 3 MEMORANDUM *** 4 Jose Solorio 1 ("Solorio") appeals his conviction and sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to Count I of the superseding indictment pursuant to the terms of a written plea agreement. (He does not challenge the conviction or sentence imposed for his 5 that Solorio's plea of guilty to Count I of the superseding indictment was made voluntarily and in compliance with Rule 11. II 6 We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Solorio's motion for withdrawal of his guilty plea. A guilty plea may be withdrawn before sentencing for "any fair and just reason." Fed.R.Crim.P.…