Villegas v. Gomez

53 F.3d 341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eleazar VILLEGAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Julio Gomez, J.D. Brady, Sergeant; Bishop, Correctional Officer; Gold, Correctional Officer; B. Forsterer, Correctional Officer; S. Bolton, Correctional Officer; and Guger, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15937. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 26, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eleazar Villegas, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying his "motion for temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction" in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his safety in violation of his constitutional rights. Villegas contends that the district court erred by finding that he failed to demonstrate the threat of irreparable harm. We have jurisdiction…