Foo

Foo v. Nagle

Good Law
58 F.2d 764·1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4770
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 1932No. 6614California716 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

This appeal is taken from an order of the District Court denying petition for writ of habeas corpus. Appellant, Lee Foo, claims to be the son of Lee Wot, a native-born citizen of the United States. Upon application for admission into the United States, Lee Foo, his alleged father, Lee Wot, also known as Lee Shew Nom, and his alleged cousin, Lee Wah, were examined in detail as to family life- and the home in Ping On village, China. The testimony of the three witnesses agreed in the main as to many intimate details of the home, family life, relationships, ancestral graves, etc. However, during the course of' the examination certain discrepancies between the testimony of the 'witnesses were-developed, and on the basis of these discrepancies the immigration authorities rejected the testimony as to the relationship between the alleged father and son, and held that the applicant had not sustained the burden of proof upon him to show that he is a citizen of the United States, and for that reason directed that he be returned to China. While he was detained for that purpose, he instituted these proceedings.

Some of the alleged discrepancies in regard to the ancestral graves, tombstones,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.