Lesher

United States v. Lesher

Good Law
59 F.2d 53·1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3308
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 1932No. 6795California1,283 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ketebeb, J.

Reversal is sought of judgment on a verdict for plaintiff on an $8,000’ war risk insurance policy claim. It is alleged that the insured became totally and permanently disabled prior to March 31, 1919, by reason of encephalitis lethargua residusu The sole is *54 sue is alleged ¡error in overruling defendant’s motion for a directed, verdict.

Under the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution, a jury trial is guaranteed in a civil action; and that it is error to direct a verdict for defendant if there is any substantial evidence is stare decisis.

Tho testimony shows that plaintiff was employed from September,1920, to Decern T $62.50, September, 1920, to $188.97, ISTovem Z -inon j a x- 1 ir ’ ctnn.fí/1 ber, 1920, and at no time less than $99.64, , / i } • a x i i noo x which was paid m beptember, 1922, or a toxin^^nonoo • xl -A jl tal of $4,080.33 covering the period, and he . l 9 .,, -i ,f J, was intermittently employed thereafter until r\ x i i^ncr • £ £ £ n October, 1925, sometimes for four full ’ rm • i .xl x months. There is, however, evidence that plaintiff was assisted in his duties by his fellow 'workers and that but for such assistance he could not have performed. ■ ‘

m. t ¿o…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.