Busch

Stanton v. Busch

Good Law
59 F.2d 668·1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3441
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 1932No. 6707California971 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Neterer, J.

From refusal to vacate an order “re-referring to * * * the Referee at San Diego with plenary powers to consider, hear, adjudicate and. determine any and all issues in the matter of lien claimants as against the trustee in bankruptcy of the estate and to exercise to the fullest extent the powers of a referee in bankruptcy in ancillary proceedings and to appoint a receiver or custodian of the property involved in the ancillary proceedings in bankruptcy within the territorial' jurisdiction of this court, and that the referee shall hear such matters upon giving the trustee in San Francisco, Northern District, at least five days’ notice in writing of the hearing of such matter by the referee,” the matter is here on appeal.

On April 15, 1931, at San Francisco, Northern district, pending an involuntary petition in bankruptcy to conserve, take, and support until a trustee is appointed, this re- *669 eeiver filed a petition in the Southern district praying- that an order ancillary in aid of the plenary receiver and authority and power to examine witnesses by a referee in San Diego as special master, alleging that properties in the Southern district were incumbered, etc., in which the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.