Peter Odima v. Westin Tucson Hotel, a Delaware Corporation, AKA Westin Hotels

Good Law
53 F.3d 1484·95 Daily Journal DAR 5491·1995 WL 246074·67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1222·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9682
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 199594-15839California7,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We revisit a Title VII employment discrimination case which comes back to us after remand for further findings surrounding the plaintiff’s six attempts to transfer out of a hotel laundry and into the hotel’s accounting department.

I

Odima is a Nigerian-born black man who was employed in the laundry at the Westin La Paloma Resort in Tucson, Arizona. After six unsuccessful attempts to transfer out of the laundry, Odima filed suit claiming that Westin had discriminated against him on the basis of race and nationality in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 , Title VII, and Arizona law. After a two-and-one-half day bench trial, the district court entered judgment in favor of Odima on his Title VII and section 1981 claims. The district court entered judgment in favor of Westin on Odima’s claims for wrongful termination, constructive discharge, retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Odima v. Westin Tucson Hotel, No. CV-89-360-TUC-WCB (DAriz. Mar. 29, 1991) (“Odima I”).

Westin appealed, and we reversed and remanded. In Odima v. Westin Tucson Hotel Co., 991 F.2d 595 (9th Cir.1993) (“Odima II ”), we held that the district court improperly concluded that because one of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.