Neece

Neece v. Durst

Good Law
61 F.2d 591·1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4347
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 1932No. 6697California5,234 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sawtelle, J.

This is an appeal from a decree adjudging the appellee, as trustee, to be the owner of five parcels of Los Angeles county land and entitled to all rents and profits accruing from four of the parcels, including oil royalties from one of the tracts.

The bill of complaint, filed June 11,1929, alleges the adjudication in bankruptcy of George W. Neeee to have been entered on July 16,1928; that the bankrupt estate showed no assets whatsoever; and that the liabilities are about $45,000. It is further alleged that, since the marriage of the bankrupt to E. Louise Neeee, the appellant herein, on November 13, 1894, the bankrupt has engaged in the real estate business, has ac *592 quired various parcels o£ property, and, as far back as 1904, has caused the legal title to such property to be vested in his wife, without any consideration to himself, all “for the sole purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding” his creditors; and that, at the time of the adjudication in bankruptcy, he "held the equitable title to the five parcels here in issue, as follows:

Parcel I: Lot 4 of block 46 of the re-subdivision of part of Alamitos Beach town-site, in Long Beach.

Parcel II: An undivided one-half…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.