United States v. Todd Eugene Cannady, United States of America v. Peter Jess Ojeda, United States of America v. Robert Lewis Black

Good Law
54 F.3d 544·95 Daily Journal DAR 4559·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7936·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2616
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 199594-50207, 94-50214 and 94-50297California2,301 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ferguson, J.

Defendants Todd Eugene Cannady, Peter Jess Ojeda, and Robert Lewis Black appeal their convictions for unrelated crimes. Each defendant contends that the jury selection plan used in the Central District of California is unconstitutional. Cannady and Ojeda also appeal on other grounds which will be determined by separate unpublished dispositions.

I.

The Central District of California spans seven counties: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura. In the 1980’s, Congress established that court in the Central District be held at federal courthouses in Los Angeles and in Santa Ana. In 1992, Congress divided the Central District into three divisions. The Western Division is composed of Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura Counties. The Southern Division is composed of Orange County. The Eastern Division is composed of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Until 1993, all juries for cases tried in the Central District, whether in the Los Angeles or in the Santa Ana courthouse, were drawn from the entire district.

In August of 1993, the Central District of California promulgated General Order 336, a new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.