Taylor Ag Industries v. Pure-Gro

Good Law
54 F.3d 555·95 Daily Journal DAR 5176·25 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20899·26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 734·40 ERC (BNA) 1777
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 199593-16852California4,398 words

Opinion

Opinion

54 F.3d 555 40 ERC 1777 , 63 USLW 2756 , 25 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,899, 26 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 734 , Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 14,216 TAYLOR AG INDUSTRIES, a general partnership; Salt River Valley Farms, a general partnership; 5J Farms, a general partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PURE-GRO, a California corporation; Nor Am Chemical Co.; Miles Inc., an Indiana corporation (formerly Mobay); Black & White Corporations, I-V, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16852. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 15, 1995. Decided April 24, 1995. William J. Downey, Rake & Downey, Phoenix, AZ, and Patti A. Goldman, Public Citizens Litigation Group, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-appellants. James L. Moore, Holtzman, Urquhart, Bayko & Moore, Houston, TX, for defendant-appellee, Miles Inc. Charles J. Muchmore, Muchmore & Wallwork, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellee, Nor Am Chemical Co. April V. Pearson, Pure-Gro Co. Law Dept., Brea, CA, and Francis J. Balint, Jr., Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman, Hienton, Miner & Fry, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellee, Pure-Gro Co. Lawrence S. Ebner, McKenna & Cuneo, Washington, DC, argued on behalf of appellees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.