Commissioner v. San Carlos Milling Co.

Good Law
63 F.2d 153·12 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 152·3 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 1049·1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3347
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 1933No. 6914California2,566 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sawtelle, J.

The taxpayer is a domestic corporation organized under the laws of the territory of Hawaii, with its principal office at Honolulu, T. H. Its principal place of business is in the municipality of San Carlos, province of Negros Occidental, Philippine Islands, where it operates a sugar mill for the manufacture of raw sugar from sugar cane, under a contract or contracts with certain planters who supply the sugar cane. These contracts will be discussed fully hereinafter. By the terms of the contracts, the taxpayer received as compensation for its milling services in the manufacture of the sugar 40’ per cent, of the raw sugar manufactured from the cane supplied by the planters. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that the sugar so received by the taxpayer under these contracts was income, because the contracts with the planters constituted a sale of the sugar to the taxpayer and therefore the taxpayer was not entitled to the benefits of section 262 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1921 ( 42 Stat. 271 ) in computing its tax for the year 3923. This determination was reversed by the Board of Tax Appeals (24 B. T. A. 1132), which held that the taxpayer was entitled to the benefits of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.