McFarland

McFarland v. United States

Good Law
65 F.2d 74·1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2920
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 8, 1933No. 6990California1,084 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sawtelle, J.

Count I of the indictment charged that on March 31, 1932, in the city of Seattle, Wash., appellant “did then and there knowingly, wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously, and not in the original stamped package, nor from the original stamped package, nor in pursuance of a written order form,” purchase *75 85 grains of morphine, in violation of the Harrison Narcotic Aet (26 USCA §§ 211, 691, et seq.). Count II charged appellant with receiving, concealing, buying, selling, and facilitating the transportation and concealment after importation of the same narcotics. The jury found appellant guilty as charged in count I and not guilty on count II.

From the testimony of the government’s witnesses, which was evidently accepted by the jury, rather than the story of appellant, it appears that on several occasions shortly prior to the date alleged in the indictment Federal Narcotic Agents Cass and Talent gave marked money to an informer named Stewart, who in turn gave the money to one Rumbaugh, whereupon Rumbaugh would proceed, followed by the agents, to apartment 0 of the Yesler Apartments, which apartment was occupied by appellant. Shortly thereafter Rumbaugh would leave appellant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.