Bogan

Bogan v. Hynes

Good Law
65 F.2d 524·1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3059
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 1933No. 7096California817 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

This is an action of ejectment. The defendants set up title in themselves and by cross-complaint seek to quiet title. The judgment of the trial court was in favor of the defendants. This is the second action between the parties over this land, which lies within a national forest reserve. The defendants were declared to be the owners thereof by the decree in the former action. This action is based upon the contention that subsequent to that decree entered February 21, 1930, the plaintiff acquired title thereto by a conveyance from the United States dated August 20, 1930, under authority of an Act of Congress of April 28, 1930 ( 46 Stat. 257 , 43 USCA § 872).

It is apparent from the pleadings, findings, and opinion of the trial court and the briefs on appeal that the basic issue between the parties is as to the effect of a deed made July 28, 1899, by the plaintiff as grantor to the United States government as grantee, in pursuance of the Act of Congress of June 4, 1897 ( 30 Stat. 36 ), permitting the surrender or conveyance to the United States of land within a national forest reserve and the selection of other government land in lieu thereof. The appellants contend that upon the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.