United States v. Smith

Good Law
67 F.2d 412·1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4487
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 1933No. 7109California2,728 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

The appellee brought this action against the government to recover on a policy of war risk insurance issued to her son Elias Melvin Zimmerman in which she was named beneficiary.

The sole question involved in the case is whether or not the war risk insurance policy issued December 3, 1917, on the application of the insured was in effect on June 30, 1921, when he died. This question, in turn, depends upon whether or not the insurance premiums chargeable to the insured should be deemed to have been paid by him as required by the terms of the policy notwithstanding the fact that he did not in fact pay the premiums and no deductions were made from his pay therefor after the period of his enlistment which expired March 17, 1918. The facts were stipulated and may be briefly summarized'as follows:

The insured enlisted in the United States Navy on March 18, 1914, at Portland, Or., as an apprentice seaman. He served throughout such enlistment and was honorably discharged at the expiration thereof on March 17, 1918. During this enlistment, to wit, on December 3, 1917, he made application for war risk insurance in the amount of $10,000 and at the time of his application for such insurance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.