Maurer

Mitchell v. Maurer

Good Law
69 F.2d 233·1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3503
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 1934No. 7262California7,002 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sawtelle, J.

Since the precise sequence of events is of crucial importance in determining the question presented by this appeal, involving as it does priority of jurisdiction as between a federal and a state court, we will give a chronological statement of the facts.

1. The appellee corporation was organized under the Jaws of Delaware. Prior to April 19, 1933, it was authorized to transact, and was engaged in, the business of insurance in California under a certificate of authority issued by the appellant.

2. On March 23, 1933, in- the Court of Chancery for New Castle county, Del., the appellee Maurer filed a bill for the appointment of a receiver for the appellee corporation. The complaint recited that the appellee Maurer had recovered a judgment against Fred Sauderoff in a New Jersey court for $20,000; that of this amount $5,000 was covered by a casualty insurance policy in favor of Sauderoff issued by the Commonwealth Casualty Company, of Pennsylvania, which, it was alleged, was a predecessor in interest of the appellee corporation; that, by reason of an alleged merger with the Commonwealth Company, the appellee corporation is indebted to the appellee Maurer in the sum of $5,-000; and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.