Manuel A. Lopez v. State Compensation Fund Jim Cooper Jane Doe Cooper Virginia Zingg John Doe Zingg

54 F.3d 785 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Manuel A. LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE COMPENSATION FUND; Jim Cooper; Jane Doe Cooper; Virginia Zingg; John Doe Zingg, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17076. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 22, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Manuel A. Lopez appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his action alleging that defendants terminated him from his job in violation of federal and state law. A dismissal without leave to amend is usually reviewed de novo. Polich v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 942 F.2d 1467, 1472 (9th Cir. 1991). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 Lopez contends that the district court erred by dismissing his action without leave to amend his complaint. This contention lacks merit. 4 The statute of limitations on actions brought under 42 U.S.C. Secs.…