Brigaerts v. Marshall

54 F.3d 785 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert BRIGAERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, California Department of Corrections; Chief, Inmate Appeals, S. Borrego; Appeals Coordinator, J. Gentry; Jourden, K. Ater, Dr. Martis, Dr. Winslow, Alex M. Astorga, Ms. Jewel, Ms. Poole, Lieutenant Long, Mr. Regan, Fernandez, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15533. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 22, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Brigaerts, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se (1) the district court's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) dismissal of his claim that the prison's inmate appeals system was inadequate and (2) the district court's grant of the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the remainder of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claims which alleged deliberate indifference toward medical needs, interference with access to the…