In Re Castle

Good Law
54 F.3d 785·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22334
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 199593-17325California1,586 words

Opinion

Opinion

54 F.3d 785 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Exeter C. CASTLE; Gustine C. Castle; Donal M. Detmers, dba Canaloupe Enterprises; Linda C. Dirksen, Debtors. Exeter C. CASTLE; Gustine C. Castle; Donal M. Detmers, dba Canaloupe Enterprises; Linda C. Dirksen, Appellants, v. PACIFIC TRUST COMPANY, Trustee for the Paul Paulson Keogh Plan, Appellee. Nos. 93-17325, NC 92-02139-OJAS. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1995. Decided May 17, 1995. Before: GIBSON, * HUG, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This case involves the issue of whether the bankruptcy court erred in defining and applying the phrases "materially false" and "reasonably relied" as set forth in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523 (a)(2)(B) (1988). Exeter and Gustine Castle, Donal Detmers, dba Canaloupe Enterprises, and Linda Dirksen (collectively "the Debtors") appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's decision affirming the bankruptcy court's order that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.