In re New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. Litigation

Good Law
54 F.3d 786·1995 WL 299888·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22322
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 199594-35131California394 words

Opinion

Opinion

54 F.3d 786 100 Ed. Law Rep. 65 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LITIGATION. Ronald TIMMONS; Bruce Kelley; Michael Hogan; Alice Lockwood; David Guterson; Marilyn Vitkevich, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation; Copley Real Estate Advisors, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35131. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 10, 1995. Decided May 17, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 Administration's ("SSA's") examining physician and to the medical 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Plaintiffs, Ronald Timmons, et al., contributing members of state administered pension plans, appeal from the dismissal of their class action against New England Mutual Life Insurance Company, and Copley Real Estate Advisors, Inc. The Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.