Valot v. English

Good Law
54 F.3d 786·1995 WL 309878·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22373
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 199594-55953California725 words

Opinion

Opinion

54 F.3d 786 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Claude L. VALOT; Barbara Valot, Plaintiffs-Appelants, v. Morris D. ENGLISH, Sr.; Morris D. English, Jr.; Wellington Group No. 5, a California limited partnership; Wellington Group No. 6, a California limited partnership; TWG Service Corp, Real Estate Securities Corp & Their Parent Companies; W. Darrow Fiedler Property Management Co.; Remax Beach Cities; Sydney K. Syvertson; Diane Syvertson; Stephan Hasselton; ICH Corp.; Integrated Resources, Inc. & Their Parent Companies, Wellington Investor Services, Inc.; Wellington Insurance Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55953. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 22, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Barbara Valot and Claude Valot appeal pro se the district court's dismissal of their action against the defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.