Alfred Swartz v. Ron Angelone Karl L. Sannicks Robin Bates Patricia McGaffin

54 F.3d 786 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alfred SWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE; Karl L. Sannicks; Robin Bates; Patricia McGaffin, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16740. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 24, 1995. * Decided May 10, 1995. Before: SNEED, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alfred Swartz, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claim as unripe. Swartz argues that his amended complaint states a cognizable claim arising from Nevada's alleged unconstitutional refusal to apply credit to his state criminal sentence. 1 We affirm. 3 Swartz pleaded guilty to theft and was sentenced to ten years in Nevada state prison (C96173), to be served concurrently to a previously imposed federal sentence. Swartz subsequently pleaded guilty to embezzlement and was sentenced to an additional nine years in prison (C96341). The embezzlement sentence…