Rudy Leonardo Penate Romero, Felix Hubert Penate Romero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
54 F.3d 786·1995 WL 309742·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22367
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 199594-70354California679 words

Opinion

Opinion

54 F.3d 786 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rudy Leonardo Penate ROMERO, Felix Hubert Penate Romero, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70354. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 22, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rudy Leonardo and Felix Hubert Penate-Romero, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of their appeals from an Immigration Judge's ("IJ") decision denying their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Secs. 1158 (a) and 1253(h). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a) and we deny the petition for review. 3 Because the BIA adopted the IJ's decision, we review the decision of the IJ. See Kazlauskas v. INS, 46 F.3d 902, 905 (9th Cir. 1995). 4 The petitioners alleged that they feared…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.