Mario Reul Najera v. State of California, Dept. Of Corrections Tomasa Schultz David King

54 F.3d 786 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mario Reul NAJERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS; Tomasa Schultz; David King; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55941. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 22, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mario Reul Najera appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of his employer, Prison Industry Authority ("PIA"), his PIA supervisor, and various PIA employees in Najera's employment discrimination action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq., and under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"), Cal. Gov't Sec. 12490 et seq. Najera also contends that the district court erred by not recusing counsel for the defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background…