Florence O'Leary v. City of Sacramento Roman Catholic Church of Sacramento Stewart Title of Sacramento

Good Law
54 F.3d 786·1995 WL 309949·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22371
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 199594-16893California302 words

Opinion

Opinion

54 F.3d 786 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Florence O'LEARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO; Roman Catholic Church of Sacramento; Stewart Title of Sacramento, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16893. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 22, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Florence O'Leary appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985 against the Roman Catholic Church, the City of Sacramento, and others. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm the dismissal of O'Leary's action for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. 3 Appellant has not properly raised and therefore waives any challenge to the portion of the district court's order expanding the scope of the previously issued pre-filing order and increasing the amount of the required bond. 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.