United States v. Walter Eugene Smith, A/K/A Blair D. Kennedy, A/K/A Blair Dwayne Kennedy, A/K/A Justin Lee Harper, AKA James Clifford Parham

Good Law
54 F.3d 786·1995 WL 309970·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22372
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 199594-30155California778 words

Opinion

Opinion

54 F.3d 786 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter Eugene SMITH, a/k/a Blair D. Kennedy, a/k/a Blair Dwayne Kennedy, a/k/a Justin Lee Harper, aka James Clifford Parham, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30155. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 22, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Walter Eugene Smith appeals pro se his conviction and 64-month sentence following guilty pleas to possessing counterfeit cashier's checks, conspiracy to possess counterfeit cashier's checks, and contempt of court. Smith contends that the indictment was defective, the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, and the district court's order of $85,926.00 in restitution was erroneous. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 A defendant who voluntarily and knowingly pleads guilty waives all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.