United States v. Dion Lamont Daniels, and Sherard Duprees Hicks

54 F.3d 786 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dion Lamont DANIELS, and Sherard Duprees Hicks, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 94-10256, 94-10257. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 22, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In this consolidated appeal, Dion Lamont Daniels appeals his conviction and 210-month sentence for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a), (d), and Sherard Duprees Hicks appeals his conviction and 175-month sentence for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a), (d). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for both Daniels and Hicks filed briefs stating that they find no meritorious issues for review. Daniel's and Hicks's counsel also filed motions to withdraw as counsel of record. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm…