Epstein v. McA, Inc.

Good Law
54 F.3d 1422·95 Daily Journal DAR 6589·32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 840·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3964·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3827
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 199592-55677California694 words

Opinion

Opinion

54 F.3d 1422 32 Fed.R.Serv.3d 840 Lawrence EPSTEIN; John Linder; Jane Rockford, as trustee of the Michael J. Rockford Trust; Maurice Karlin; Ruth Karlin; Beth Ann Karlin; Bert P. Karlin; Walter Minton, Plaintiffs, v. MCA, INC.; Matsushita Acquisition Corporation; Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.; Matsushita Holding Corporation; Lew Wasserman; Sidney J. Sheinberg, Defendant-Appellees. Roger W. Kirby; Kaufman, Malchman, Kaufmann & Kirby, Applicants-Appellants. No. 92-55677. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1993. Submission Vacated Aug. 13, 1993. Resubmitted Oct. 12, 1994. Memorandum Filed Feb. 24, 1995. Order and Opinion Filed May 23, 1995. Irving Malchman, Roger W. Kirby, and Ernest T. Kaufman, Kaufman, Malchman, Kirby & Squire, New York City, for Epstein plaintiffs-applicants-appellants. Barry R. Ostrager and Mary Kay Vyskocil, Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, New York City, for Matsushita and MCA, defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: NORRIS, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. ORDER The memorandum disposition filed on February 24, 1995 is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.