Jane Doe v. Petaluma City School District

54 F.3d 1447 100 Ed. Law Rep. 568 Jane DOE, a minor, By and Through her Guardian ad Litem, John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PETALUMA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT; Petaluma Joint Union High School District; Richard Homrighouse, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-15917. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1994. Decided May 12, 1995. Larry J. Frierson and Scott N. Kivel, Liebert, Cassidy & Frierson, San Francisco, CA, Robert J. Henry, School & College Legal Services, Santa Rosa, CA, for defendants-appellants. Maria Blanco, Equal Rights Advocates, San Francisco, CA and Julie Goldscheid, NOW Legal Defense & Educ. Fund, New York City, for plaintiff-appellee. Charles W. Matheis, Jr., Beam, Brobeck & West, Santa Ana, CA, for amicus curiae, California School Boards Ass'n Educ. Legal Alliance. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Chief Judge WALLACE; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON. WALLACE, Chief Judge: 1 Homrighouse appeals from a district court order denying him qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction over this timely…