Jerry Edmon Fordyce v. City of Seattle, Jerry Edmon Fordyce v. City of Seattle M.S. Donnelly C. Villagracia, (Two Cases.) Jerry Edmon Fordyce v. City of Seattle, and M.S. Donnelly C. Villagracia

Good Law
55 F.3d 436
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 199593-35824California3,677 words

Opinion

Opinion

55 F.3d 436 23 Media L. Rep. 2011 Jerry Edmon FORDYCE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Defendant-Appellant. Jerry Edmon FORDYCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SEATTLE; M.S. Donnelly; C. Villagracia, Defendants-Appellees. (Two Cases.) Jerry Edmon FORDYCE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Defendant-Appellant, and M.S. Donnelly; C. Villagracia, Defendants. Nos. 93-35824, 93-35840, 93-35991 and 93-36020. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1994. Submission Withdrawn Oct. 20, 1994. Resubmitted Feb. 27, 1995. Decided May 16, 1995. Ted Buck, Stafford Frey Cooper, Seattle, WA, for defendants-appellants-appellees. James E. Lobsenz, Carney, Badley, Smith & Spellman, Seattle, WA, for plaintiff-appellee-appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Before: LAY, * TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. TROTT, Circuit Judge: I. Background 1 This case arises from the alleged interference by police officers of the City of Seattle with Jerry Edmon Fordyce's attempt on August 5, 1990 to videotape a public protest march. Fordyce, who apparently considered himself part of the protest, had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.