SCHROEDER v. McDONALD

Good Law
55 F.3d 454·32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 196·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11813·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3701
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199593-15169California4,720 words

Opinion

Opinion

55 F.3d 454 32 Fed.R.Serv.3d 196 Eric SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pete McDONALD, Branch Administrator; Susan Segawa, Social Worker; Ron Mico, Social Worker; George W. Sumner, DPS Director; Roland Leong, Prison Guard, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-15169. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. Decided May 19, 1995. Steven S. Michaels, Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, HI, for defendants-appellants. Eric A. Seitz and Edie A. Feldman, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Before: POOLE, WIGGINS, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: 1 Defendants-appellants ("defendants") appeal the district court's denial in part of their motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff-appellee ("plaintiff") brought suit under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . The district court found that defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity with regard to five of plaintiff's eleven causes of action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2817 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). We find defendants are entitled to qualified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.