Barrus v. Sylvania

Good Law
55 F.3d 468·34 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1859·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11815·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3697
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199594-55040California1,481 words

Opinion

Opinion

55 F.3d 468 1995-1 Trade Cases P 70,996 , 34 U.S.P.Q.2d 1859 Jerry P. BARRUS; Paul C. Pfeifle, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SYLVANIA, a division of GTE; GTE Products Corporation, a subsidiary of GTE Products of Connecticut Corporation; GTE Products of Connecticut Corp., a subsidiary of GTE Corp.; GTE Corp.; Osram Sylvania, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55040. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 3, 1995. * Decided May 19, 1995. Marcus J. Berger, Howarth & Smith, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. M. Laurence Popofsky, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees. Before: FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellants Jerry Barrus and Paul Pfeifle filed a class action lawsuit against Sylvania and its various parent corporations on behalf of all consumers who purchased Sylvania light bulbs before July 14, 1993. 1 Appellants claim that defendants violated section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1125 (a)(1)(B) (Supp. V 1993), by falsely advertising Sylvania "Energy Saver" light bulbs. 2 According to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.