McDonough

McDonough v. Owl Drug Co.

Good Law
75 F.2d 45·1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2863
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 1935No. 7485California2,594 words

Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Sawtelle, J.

participated in the hearing of the above case and the conference thereon and concurred in the result, but died before the opinion was prepared.

Lead Opinion

Webster, J.

Appellants, preferred stockholders of the Owl Drug Company, a corporation, organized under the laws of the state of Nevada, are prosecuting this appeal from an order or judgment of the District Court for the District of Nevada — the Honorable Jeremiah Neterer presiding — dismissing, on motion of the appellees, appellants’ petition praying that the order of the District Court adjudging the Owl Drug Company a bankrupt be set aside and annulled upon the ground that such adjudication had been procured by extrinsic fraud and that the District Court was being used as an agency or instrumentality through the mediumship of which the alleged fraudulent scheme or enterprise was being carried to consummation. It is conceded by appellants, through their counsel, that the United States District Court for the District of Nevada was a court of competent jurisdiction to entertain the voluntary petition in bankruptcy filed by the Owl Drug Company, and that under the conditions then disclosed to the court there was no alternative but to make the adjudication of bankruptcy now sought to be set aside.

The sole claim of appellants is that because of after-discovered fraud on the part of the bankrupt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.