Pflueger

Pflueger v. Sherman

Good Law
75 F.2d 84·1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 2868
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 1935No. 7321California4,444 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

Three actions were filed by stockholders of H. Flackfeld & Co., Limited, in relation to the alleged sale of that corporation’s assets, to American Factors, Limited:

1. Isenberg v. Sherman, in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Cal.; judgment against the complaining stockholders, who were also the complainants below and are the appellants herein, affirmed by the Supreme Court of California, 212 Cal. 454 , 298 P. 1004 ; petition for rehearing denied, with opinion, 212 Cal. 507, 508 , 299 P. 528 ; motion to recall re-mittitur denied, with opinion, 214 Cal. 722, 732 , 7 P.(2d) 1006; certiorari denied, 286 U. S. 547 , 52 S. Ct. 501 , 76 L. Ed. 1283 . The first opinion by the Supreme Court of California is 50 pages in length.

2. Trent Trust Company, Ltd., v. Miller, Equity No. 2575, Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit of Hawaii. This action was still pending at the time the record herein was prepared.

3. The action herein.

On October 17,1924, the appellants herein instituted this suit in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit of Hawaii. The case was removed to the District Court of the United States for the territory. The bill was entitled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.