Bernheimer

Bernheimer v. First Nat. Bank of Beverly Hills

Good Law
78 F.2d 139·1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3656
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 1935No. 7592California3,346 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garrecht, J.

The First National Bank of Beverly Hills, appellee, has been and is now a national banking association organized under the laws of the United States and authorized to do a trust business under the laws of the United States and of the state of California. Said bank, up to and including June 3, .1932, operated and conducted a general banking business in the city of Beverly Hills, Cal. Said bank was authorized to act as trustee, executor, administrator, and in other fiduciary capacities agreeable to the laws of the state of California, pursuant to which it conducted a departmental bank, consisting of a Commercial department and a Trust department, said departments being operated separately from each other. On and prior to February 6, 1931, and thereafter to and including June '3, 1932, the said bank was the duly appointed and acting trustee of divers and sundry trusts, including Participation Trust No. 1005, series 1 to 31, herein referred to as “Participation Trust,” and including the Private Trusts Nos. 1059 and 1060, hereinafter referred to as “Taylor Trusts,” and said bank held and administered all of said trusts.

Nellie Euretta Taylor, appellee and intervener, on March 16,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.