Tetz

Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Tetz

Good Law
82 F.2d 683·1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3077
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 1936No. 7934California2,672 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

This is an action by a surety company, appellant, to recover from its principal, appellee, the amount paid by it on account of a surety bond executed by it on behalf of the copartnership of Godfredson & Tetz, composed of C. Godfredson and R. Tetz, for the faithful performance of a contract for the construction of waterworks and for the payment of labor and other claims resulting therefrom for the town of La Conner, in the state of Washington.

In a suit prosecuted by appellant to determine its liability under the bond to various claimants, judgment was procured July 14, 1932, in a superior court in the state of Washington against the appellant for the amount of $15,706 with costs amounting to $65, which it paid. The appellant seeks to recover this amount from the appellee R. Tetz, his partner C. God *684 fredson being insolvent, and $699.36 in addition for expenses incurred in the trial of said action, together with interest on both amounts.

The appellant alleges that C. Godfredson and R. Tetz were copartners; that they entered into the bond and the contract for the work therein.specified as such copartners.

The case was tried by the court; the jury having been expressly waived…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.