Hy-Lo Unit & Metal Products Co. v. Remote Control Mfg. Co.

Good Law
83 F.2d 345·29 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 221·1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2519
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 13, 1936No. 7833California3,959 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

Appellant is the owner of patent No. 1,617,094, issued to it as assignee of Charles Atherton in February, 1927, for a remote control gas valve to be operated in-connection with a heating furnace. It brought this action against the appellee for the infringement of that patent.

Appellee admits that the device manufactured by it would infringe the patent if valid, but denies the validity of the patent on the ground that the same was anticipated by an invention by one El Roy L. Payne. Payne had applied for a patent on his invention before Atherton had applied for the patent in question, but the latter patent was issued by inadvertence. Later interference proceedings were instituted which ultimately resulted in the decision by the .Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, Atherton v. Payne, 54 F.(2d) 821 , hereinafter referred to. The trial of the issues was referred to a master, and subsequent to such reference the appellant sought to file a supplemental complaint alleging that the appellee was estopped to assert the invalidity of the Atherton patent upon the ground that the appellee was in privity with the defendant in a prior infringement suit instituted by appellee against the Potter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.